Skip to main content

Should You Build Your Own EU AI Act Compliance Scanner?

The honest build vs. buy analysis — engineering hours, maintenance burden, and true annual cost.

The Argument: "I'll Just Build My Own Scanner"

Static analysis tools are open-source, fast, and already installed in most CI pipelines. It feels like a natural fit: write some patterns, run on PR, done. This logic breaks down when you account for the EU AI Act's scope. The regulation spans 113 articles, references multiple Annexes, applies differently to providers vs deployers, and changes as the Commission publishes delegated acts and guidance.

Writing a rule for "does this model have a risk management system" is not one regex — it is a family of patterns across Python, TypeScript, Java, Go, and whatever language your ML pipelines run in, with false-positive tuning for each, maintained as codebases evolve.

Reality Check: The Engineering Cost

113
Articles to cover
2–4h
Per article (rule writing)
452h
Total first-year work

At €200/h fully-loaded engineering cost: 452h × €200 = €90,400 first-year. Ongoing maintenance (keeping rules current with Commission guidance, new language support, FP tuning) adds roughly €40,000+/yr thereafter.

Self-Hosted vs Scanara Business

FeatureSelf-hosted scannerScanara Business
Rule maintenanceYour teamIncluded
113-article coverageBuild yourselfShipped
Multi-language supportBuild yourself10+ languages
Annex IV generationManualAutomated
FRIA / AIRA workflowsNoneBuilt-in
GitHub integrationCI script onlyChecks API + merge gate
False-positive dedupManual tuningAutomatic
Support SLACommunity24h (Business)
Annual cost€40K–€90K€9,588

Start free — compare the self-hosted cost yourself

Free tier: 2 repos, 5 scans, 3 assessments, and 2 Annex IV dossiers (lifetime). No credit card required.

See pricing

How Scanara Helps

Scanara automates EU AI Act compliance from code to dossier. Connect your GitHub repos and get compliance reports in minutes.