EU AI Act Compliance Checklist
A complete, article-referenced checklist for providers, deployers, and GPAI model providers preparing for EU AI Act enforcement.
This checklist covers every binding obligation under the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) — the world's first comprehensive AI regulation. It is organized by role (provider, deployer, GPAI model provider) and enforcement deadline, with article references for each item. High-risk AI system obligations under Articles 9–21 apply from 2 December 2027 for Annex III systems (2 August 2028 for Annex I systems), per Regulation (EU) 2026/1744. Prohibited practices under Article 5 have been enforceable since 2 February 2025.
Set Your Profile
Select your role and AI system type to filter the checklist to the obligations that apply to you.
I am a…
My AI system's risk class
Enforcement timeline
Prohibited Practices
GPAI Obligations
Prohibited Practices Expansion
Existing GPAI Models Deadline
Annex III High-Risk Obligations
Annex I High-Risk Obligations
Step 1 — Determine your role
Your obligations depend on which role(s) you hold. Most engineering teams fall under Provider or Deployer.
Provider
Art. 3(3)You develop an AI system and place it on the EU market or put it into service — including open-source models, regardless of commercial intent.
Full Articles 9–21 obligations apply
Deployer
Art. 3(4)You use an AI system under your authority in a professional context (not personal non-professional use).
Article 26 obligations apply
GPAI Model Provider
Art. 3(63)You place a general-purpose AI model (LLM, multimodal foundation model) trained on large-scale data on the EU market.
Articles 51–56 obligations apply
Importer / Distributor
Art. 3(6)/(7)You bring a non-EU provider's AI system into the EU market (importer) or make an AI system available without being the provider (distributor).
Articles 23–24 due-diligence obligations apply
Step 3 — Classify your AI system's risk level
The Annex III categories below trigger full Articles 9–21 provider obligations. AI used as a safety component in products governed by Annex I sector legislation (medical devices, machinery, aviation) is also high-risk.
Exclusions from high-risk (Article 6(3))
A system in an Annex III category may be excluded from high-risk classification if it does not pose a significant risk to health, safety, or fundamental rights — for example: narrow procedural tasks, improving existing human activities, detecting patterns in prior human data, or preparing assessments reviewed by human professionals. Providers must document the exclusion rationale and register the decision in the EU database.
Step 2 — Prohibited practices sweep (Article 5)
Enforcement deadline: 2 February 2025 — Fine: EUR 35M or 7% of global turnover
Verify none of the following apply to any system you develop or deploy. These are absolute prohibitions with no compliance pathway.
Step 4 — High-risk provider obligations (Articles 9–21)
Enforcement deadline: 2 December 2027. Fine for violations: EUR 15M or 3% of global turnover.
Article 9 — Risk management system
A continuous process covering the full AI system lifecycle.
Article 10 — Data governance and management
Applies to all training, validation, and testing datasets.
Article 11 — Technical documentation (Annex IV)
Must be prepared before market placement; retained 10 years (Art. 18).
Article 12 — Record-keeping and logging
Automatic logging capability must be built in by design; logs retained for a minimum of 6 months (Art. 19).
Article 13 — Transparency and information provision
Instructions for use (Annex XIII format) must accompany every high-risk AI system.
Article 14 — Human oversight
Natural persons must be able to effectively oversee the system during deployment. Human approval of every decision is not required — meaningful intervention capability is sufficient.
Article 15 — Accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity
Declared accuracy levels must be maintained throughout the lifecycle; post-market monitoring must track accuracy degradation.
Article 17 — Quality management system
QMS covers the full AI lifecycle. SMEs may implement a proportionate QMS, but all required elements must be present.
Step 5 — Conformity assessment and EU database registration
Required before market placement.
Articles 43–44 — Conformity assessment
Article 49 — EU database registration
Step 6 — Deployer obligations (Article 26)
Applies to organisations using high-risk AI systems in a professional context. Enforcement deadline: 2 December 2027.
Step 7 — GPAI model obligations (Articles 51–56)
Applies to providers of general-purpose AI models (LLMs, multimodal foundation models). Enforcement deadline: 2 August 2025. Transitional deadline for pre-existing models: 2 August 2027.
All GPAI model providers (Article 53)
Systemic risk models (Article 55)
Presumed systemic risk if trained with more than 10²⁵ FLOPs. The European Commission may also designate models based on capability assessment or market impact.
Step 8 — Limited-risk transparency obligations (Article 50)
Applies to chatbots, deepfake generators, emotion recognition, and biometric categorisation systems outside the prohibited or high-risk scope. Enforcement deadline: 2 August 2026.
Step 9 — Post-market monitoring and incident reporting (Articles 72–73)
Providers must report serious incidents within 15 days of becoming aware.
Enforcement fines (Article 99)
| Violation category | Maximum fine |
|---|---|
| Prohibited practices (Article 5) | EUR 35 million or 7% of worldwide annual turnover |
| High-risk, GPAI, and technical requirement violations (Articles 9–21, 51–56) | EUR 15 million or 3% of worldwide annual turnover |
| Incorrect or misleading information to authorities | EUR 7.5 million or 1% of worldwide annual turnover |
Fines apply to the higher of the fixed amount or the percentage of global annual turnover. SMEs and startups benefit from proportionality provisions. For non-EU providers, fines apply to the EU-established authorised representative.
Print or save as PDF
Use your browser's print dialog to save the full checklist as a PDF.
Tip: choose "Save as PDF" as the destination in the print dialog.
Related guides
The Engineer's Guide to the EU AI Act
Article-by-article breakdowns, deadlines, and practical compliance guidance.
AI Risk Classification Guide
Determine whether your AI system is high-risk, limited-risk, or minimal-risk under the EU AI Act.
Article 12 Audit Trail Requirements
Technical requirements for structured logging, immutability, and record-keeping implementation.
EU AI Act Compliance for Developers
CI/CD integration, compliance-as-code, automated scanning, and shift-left compliance strategies.
How Scanara Helps
Scanara automates EU AI Act compliance from code to dossier. Connect your GitHub repos and get compliance reports in minutes.